Which of the following is NOT an early indicator of a potential insider threat?

A reasonable disagreement with U.S. Government policy is not considered an early indicator of a potential insider threat because dissenting opinions and differing viewpoints are a normal part of a democratic society and workplace culture. Such disagreements can stem from a variety of legitimate reasons, including personal beliefs, values, or moral convictions, and do not inherently suggest the presence of a threat.

In contrast, behaviors such as a sudden extreme change in behavior, excessive secrecy about personal actions, and withdrawal from colleagues are often associated with a shift in someone's attitude or engagement that may indicate potential risks. These behaviors may signal distress, exposure to radical ideas, or a decreased sense of community, all of which warrant further observation and assessment as they could compromise security. Recognizing and understanding the distinction between normal dissent and troubling behavior is crucial for effectively identifying insider threats.