Which situation would NOT constitute a terrorism threat?

A peaceful protest would not constitute a terrorism threat because it typically involves a lawful expression of views and opinions. In democratic societies, peaceful protests are protected as a form of free speech and are a normal method for citizens to voice their concerns or dissent without resorting to violence or intimidation. The fundamental distinction lies in the absence of violent intent or actions associated with peaceful protests; the participants are generally aiming for social change through dialogue and lawful assembly rather than aiming to instill fear or coerce populations, which are hallmarks of terrorism.

On the other hand, scenarios involving a radical group planning an attack, an individual stockpiling weapons unlawfully, and an active shooter scenario all bear characteristics associated with terrorist activities or threats. These actions indicate intent or capability to cause harm, destabilize societal order, or incite fear, aligning them with forms of terrorism.